Gov Contract Index

Srctec, LLC

Srctec, LLC has been obligated $25,290,571 on federal contracts across the group, including its subsidiaries. The 6 largest of 6 awards on record are below, from 1 awarding agency.

Obligations net of de-obligations, as reported by the awarding agency. Not revenue, not profit, and not a measure of the company’s size.

Who this is

Unique Entity ID (UEI)PUT4KUNBLDS5
DUNS (retired 2022)620329305
Also filed asSRC Inc. · SRC Tec Inc · SRC Tec Incorporated · Srctec LLC
Registered asCorporate Entity Not Tax Exempt Limited Liability Corporation Manufacturer Of Goods Other Than Small Business US Owned Business
Registered addressSyracuse, NY

Largest awards

AwardAgencyObligatedPeriod
0001 Department of Defense
Department of the Army
$319,636,089 2009-08-28 – 2010-12-31
performed in MD
0007 Department of Defense
Department of the Army
$220,613,327 2010-04-23 – 2011-09-30
performed in MD
0032 Department of Defense
Department of the Army
$159,612,700 2008-12-10 – 2009-08-31
performed in NY
0013 Department of Defense
Department of the Army
$134,887,826 2006-07-17 – 2008-04-30
performed in NY
W56KGY23F0011 Department of Defense
Department of the Army
$105,905,243 2023-01-31 – 2026-12-31
0042 Department of Defense
Department of the Army
$89,272,982 2010-04-01 – 2010-12-31
performed in MD

Tell me when Srctec, LLC wins something

One email when a new federal contract award to Srctec, LLC appears in the Treasury’s data, with the agency, the amount and where the work is performed. Measured over one week in September 2026, a company in this register took a median of one new award, so this is an alert rather than a feed.

Double opt-in. One email per change, unsubscribe in one click. No newsletter. Privacy policy.

Source: USAspending.gov, the U.S. Treasury’s DATA Act award data, in the public domain. This site is not affiliated with any agency. A listing here is a record of federal obligations and is not an endorsement or a statement about the company’s conduct. If something here is wrong, tell us and we will correct it.